Cramer on Trump’s ‘boneheads’ tweet: Fed should really cut rates but should not go negative


Jim Cramer

Scott Mlyn | CNBC

CNBC’s Jim Cramer said on Wednesday that Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell should be cutting interest rates further, but should not go to negative rates as President Donald Trump suggested.

“Negative rates, no. You don’t want negative rates. That’s just a sign that we’re not a robust economy,” said Cramer, reacting to Trump’s early morning tweet, in which the president called the Powell-led Fed “boneheads” and urged central bankers get rates “down to ZERO, or less.”

On “Squawk on the Street,” Cramer jokingly said he would not call Powell and other members of the Fed “boneheads,” but the “Mad Money” did reiterate his criticism of the Fed chief’s reluctance to embrace a more aggressive cutting posture as many countries around the world have gone negative with their rates.

The Fed is set to meet next Tuesday and Wednesday. Central bankers are widely expected to cut the fed funds overnight bank lending rate by a quarter-point for the second time this year. The current target range for fed funds is 2% to 2.25%. The Fed’s July rate cut was the first such move in more than 10 years. Powell and his fellow central bankers have been in the president’s cross-hairs even since they hiked rates four times last year.

In his Wednesday tweet, Trump also wrote that with borrowing rates so low in the U.S. and around the world the government should “refinance our debt.” He added, “INTEREST COST COULD BE BROUGHT WAY DOWN, while at the same time substantially lengthening the term.”

Cramer, who has repeatedly expressed support for government bonds with longer durations of than the current 30-year Treasury, said the president has a point.

“I talked about a 50-year bond that we’d all love to ‘make our roads great again,'” Cramer said Wednesday. The reference to “roads” was a suggestion to use the proceeds from such a bond sale to finance infrastructure projects.

Last month, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said, in a Bloomberg interview, that ultra-long U.S. bonds are being considered by the Trump administration.

Articles You May Like

Charlie Munger lived in the same home for 70 years: Rich people who build ‘really fancy houses’ become ‘less happy’
Goldman Sachs is betting on the small cap rally. Here’s how.
Best Housewarming Gifts: TV/Audio/Home Theatre Items For The Home
Three reasons a strong Black Friday weekend may not mean a blowout holiday season for retailers
There’s now a juiced-up way to get 4 times the return of the S&P 500 — but it comes with many risks

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *