Impossible Foods could be at risk of losing a key patent in legal battle with Motif Foodworks

Business

Plant-based burgers developed by Impossible Foods Inc. are seen at the 2nd China International Import Expo (CIIE) at the National Exhibition and Convention Center on November 6, 2019 in Shanghai, China.
China News Service | Getty Images

Plant-based meat maker Impossible Foods could be at risk of losing a key patent as part of an ongoing legal dispute with competitor Motif Foodworks.

Motif asked the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to revoke a patent held by Impossible protecting the company’s heme technology. Impossible sued Motif in March, claiming that the start-up’s heme-based beef alternative too closely imitates its own version.

Impossible’s beef and pork substitutes use soy leghemoglobin, which is produced from genetically modified yeast, to imitate the taste and aroma of real meat.

Both companies are privately owned, although Impossible is much larger, with a valuation of $9.5 billion. Along with publicly traded Beyond Meat, Impossible has helped rejuvenate the market for vegetarian burgers. Losing its patent on heme could mean even stiffer competition within the meat alternative market.

Motif filed a petition with the USPTO’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board on Wednesday to ask a panel of judges to review Impossible’s patent and weigh whether it should be revoked.

“We are confident the Patent Trial and Appeal Board will agree with our view that the patent never should have been issued and revoke it,” a Motif spokesperson said in a statement to CNBC. “Our industry should work together to grow the plant-based category for the greater good – to benefit people and the planet. Competition is healthy. And it should play out in the marketplace, not the courts.”

Motif has raised $343.5 million from investors including Bill Gates and was valued at $1.23 billion last year, according to Pitchbook. It was spun out of biotech start-up Ginkgo Bioworks.

When Motif launched in 2019, Ginkgo co-founder and CEO Jason Kelly told CNBC that Impossible’s success inspired the formation of Motif, which develops key ingredients for making plant-based proteins and leaves the rest to food companies.

Impossible alleges that Motif’s Hemami product infringes on its patent for a beef replica using heme, a molecule found in traditional beef burgers that Impossible and Motif both use as an ingredient. Motif’s version uses bovine myoglobin as its heme source.

In its original complaint, Impossible said its patent covers the invention of a beef substitute that uses a muscle replica including a heme-containing protein, at least one sugar compound and one sulfur compound. It also protects against the invention of a meat alternative that mimics meat through a fat tissue replica that uses at least one plant oil and a denatured plant protein.

Impossible did not immediately respond to a request for comment from CNBC.

Articles You May Like

TJ Maxx parent says holiday shopping is off to a ‘strong start,’ but its guidance tells another story
Walmart hikes its outlook again as shoppers spend more outside the grocery aisles
Caitlin Clark joins NWSL ownership group bidding to bring soccer team to Cincinnati
Here’s how to leverage the 0% capital gains bracket as the price of bitcoin surges
Dental supply stock rallies on theory RFK’s anti-fluoride stance will prompt more dentist visits

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *